ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report two cases of acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) in young female patients following the administration of the adenovirus-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca). METHODS: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and infrared imaging were used to confirm the diagnosis of AMN. RESULTS: Both patients showed a parafoveal hyperreflective band in the outer nuclear layer, disruption of the ellipsoid and interdigitation zones of the photoreceptor layers, and correlating hyporeflective areas on the near-infrared images. Both patients presented with flu-like fever and sudden onset of fortifications within 48 hours of vaccination. One patient showed altered flow in the deep capillary plexus and highly elevated thrombotic parameters. CONCLUSION: We report a possible association between immune-mediated AMN and the administration of adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccine Vaxzevria.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Macula Lutea , Retinal Diseases , White Dot Syndromes , Female , Humans , Acute Disease , Adenoviridae , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Fluorescein Angiography/methods , Retinal Diseases/diagnosis , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , White Dot Syndromes/chemically inducedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, strict hygiene and containment measures have been instituted in the clinical ophthalmological examination to prevent virus transmission. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of these protective measures on the quality of the examination with an emphasis on gender-specific differences. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An online survey was sent to ophthalmologists in 10 countries. The collected data included demographics, place of work, current professional status, COVID-19 protective measures and their impact on the quality of the examination. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Fisher's exact test was used to analyse gender differences. RESULTS: A total of 120 responses were collected. 54.0% of the respondents identified as female and 43.4% as male. Over 75% agreed that protective measures made the examination conditions more difficult. The major problems were fogging of the lenses (87.6%) or slit lamp oculars (69.9%), reduced operability of the slit lamp due to protective barriers (60.2%) and time delay due to disinfection measures (68.1%). Significantly more women than men reported that they used filtering face piece (FFP2) instead of surgical masks (p=0.02). More male participants reported that they removed their mask to prevent fogging (p=0.01). 31% of all participants felt that the COVID-19 protective measures reduced the overall quality of slit lamp examination and 43.4% reported a reduced quality of fundoscopic examination. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 related safety measures reduce the feasibility of the clinical ophthalmological examination. Practicable solutions are required to maintain good examination quality without compromising personal safety.